Choosing characters to reprise in future installments can be one of the more difficult decisions story-wise for game franchises. Hogwarts Legacy 2 faces several difficult choices in this aspect, regardless of where Warner Bros. decides to place the sequel in the timeline. Not much is known about the developer's vision for the site, but one question that is obviously prioritized is what happens to The legacy of Hogwartsfourth year protagonist. Likewise, the casting of crucial supporting characters like Sebastian Sallow is still up in the air, with little concrete information about the sequel available to the public. If a follow-up game does become a reality, as all indications suggest, there are arguments for and against cracking down on the Slytherin wizard.
There were several captivating stories in The legacy of Hogwartss groundbreaking debut; from freeing captured dragons on the main track after Ranrok's wizard rebellion to bonding with fellow students in lectures at the iconic school of wizardry and witchcraft, there was hardly any shortage of entertainment. But in terms of character building, few compare in terms of scope to Sebastian Sallow's arc, as his obsession with restoring his sister to good health played a crucial role in spellcasting techniques. His story ended in tragedy, and depending on the players' choices, he could be expelled from the school or keep his student body – both of which have implications for the next chapter of The legacy of Hogwartss story.
Sebastian's dynamic puts Hogwarts Legacy 2 at a crossroads
The case against Sebastian Sallow returns to Hogwarts' legacy
Harry PotterThe plot is deeply immersed in light overcoming darkness and evil and paying for their crimes. In keeping with these principles, it wouldn't be out of place for the developer to commit Sebastian's character to Azkaban, thus ending the arc that his banishment started. While this could be a platform for his rise as an evil overlord through a jailbreak, the possibility is rather far-fetched given the prison's near-impregnable reputation.
As such, Sebastian has little reason to appear in The legacy of Hogwartss sequel if he serves time for his actions, except for some greetings to his persona, which may come via an occasional letter checking on the protagonist's well-being. One of the areas of criticism The legacy of Hogwarts endured was the perceived leniency towards the use of the dark arts, with only Solomon Sallow exhibiting a visceral reaction to its use in his presence. Warner Bros. was able to correct this oversight by making Sebastian a person from the past.
In terms of the overall story, the option of Sebastian being punished for his shortcomings means that his arc has already been completed. While the developer could decide to bring back the Voldemort trope and crown him as the next high-profile villain in Harry Potter franchise, it may also let sleeping dogs lie and pursue a unique path for the sequel.
The case for Sebastian Sallow's inclusion in the Hogwarts Legacy sequel
Morally, it would be correct for Avalanche Software to turn the page on Sebastian because he killed his uncle with an unforgivable curse. But the case for his exclusion from the franchise's future isn't so cut and dry. Sebastian makes an immediate impact The legacy of Hogwartsthe protagonist's skills in battle, from introducing players to the Battle Arena to learning unforgivable curses. In addition to his unofficial mentor role, he is also a close confidant, which makes removing him entirely from the sequel a decision in bad taste. Whether he's a prisoner in Azkaban or a locked-up criminal, it could be argued that Sebastian has another key role to play in The legacy of Hogwartss follow-up title.
Beyond just looks, there's room for more story development when it comes to the Slytherin wizard. He's already shown to be a stereotypical “end justifies the means” character, which fits a lot of the darker Harry Potter numbers. The path to him becoming a 19th-century-style Voldemort is almost linear, whether he pays for his crimes through banishment or escapes punishment. Despite his remorse for killing his uncle, he doesn't particularly regret any of his choices leading up to that fateful act, so it stands to reason that he would make an excellent villain in the sequel and future games. That's one thing Harry Potter franchise needs to thrive, and it would be disappointing to many if the developer were to skip the obvious choice.
