Battlefield 6 has been one of the biggest launches of the year, and while its status as one of 2025's most acclaimed releases is impressive, it still has competition within its own franchise. Of course, Battlefield 6 has been making waves since its launch due to the fact that it provides Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 a run for the money, but there are still some features in the game that feel out of place, at least when it comes to immersion.
It has not been an easy year for it Battlefield franchise. After the poor reception Battlefield 2042 received, Battlefield 6 had a lot riding on it, and DICE was thankfully able to return to the series' winning formula, for the most part. Battlefield 6 feels much more grounded than its divisive predecessor, though, when you compare the new title to the still beloved one Battlefield 1something is missing in the poignant realism that the latter excels with even years after its launch.
Battlefield 6 has some immersive features that can take players out of the experience
-
More experimental skins
-
Unrealistic weapons in REDSEC
-
Floating weapons drop in REDSEC
One of the main features that will break the immersion for some Battlefield 6 players are the skin of the game. granted, Battlefield 6 skins are far from being as crazy as the skins Call of Duty has grown to include, but there are still some cosmetics added to the former that have already caused controversy within the community. The Battlefield 6 community has taken their distaste for non-immersive skins very seriously, but that hasn't stopped EA from trying to add these less realistic cosmetics.
Even when it matters Battlefield REDSECthere is more freedom to make outlandish choices with their weapons. Then Battlefield REDSEC is Battlefield 6s Battle Royale counterpart, it makes sense that some of the weapons are over-the-top, but specific players may still prefer a much more straight-laced experience. Two of Battlefield REDSECs wildest weapons are the Rorsch Mk-2 SMRW and MP-RMG. The Rorsch Mk-2 SMRW is a reloadable railgun, while the MP-RMG is a minigun that has an insanely high rate of fire. These two are rare, but when found in a match, each weapon can feel like living out a power fantasy, especially when considering classic Battlefield standards. Add in the fact that they're displayed in an immersion-breaking way – floating slightly above the ground and highlighted with a brightly colored outline – and the experience starts to feel a bit more Arcadian than some would like.
IN Battlefield 6s defense, its modern setting definitely requires weapon innovation, and it's not entirely realistic that some rare weapons should feel like they're from the very near future. Even from the beginning, Battlefield 6s marketing has made it clear that it is geared more towards action-packed matches, which is much more appealing to some FPS fans. Still, for players who want something more grounded (or miss the highlights of immersion in previous entries), it's understandable why the latest entry is a bit of a letdown for them.
Battlefield 1's slower pace automatically provides a deeper level of immersion
Across the franchise, Battlefield 6 has some of the smallest maps in the entire series. Battlefield 1 may not have the biggest maps across the board, but its large maps are incredibly expansive, requiring more strategy and planning. This immediately improves immersion, as it not only requires more brain power from players, but it also forces them to take their time. The slower pace makes a big difference, so FPS lovers who really love to feel like they're in the trenches tend to be more attracted to Battlefield 1.
Beyond the slower pace, Battlefield 1 has some of the most realistic dialogue in the franchise. Soldiers in the game speak their own language by default, be it English, French, German or Turkish. The dialogue is also much more dynamic and contextual, adding an even deeper layer to the realism that FPS boasts.
Battlefield 6 and Battlefield 1's All-Time Peak Player Count on Steam
- Battlefield 6 – 747,440
- Battlefield 1 – 53,714
Obviously, these numbers are drastically different, but despite being almost a decade old, Battlefield 1 is still quite active. At the time of writing, there were still around 5,000 active players on Steam. At the same time, Battlefield 6 pulled in around 112,000 players, which is a huge difference, but it's fascinating that Battlefield 1 fans are still hanging on regardless of the new title. Battlefield 6 has proven to be an FPS powerhouse, but the draw of Battlefield 1 for gamers who love realism cannot be taken for granted. Its heavily grounded gameplay and embrace of immersion over non-stop action is incredibly appealing to many people, and while it's not everyone's cup of tea, longtime fans continue to revel in it. Battlefield 6 has much more content and a more palatable environment, but it does not always capture the attention of players.
Is Battlefield 6 or Battlefield 1 the right fit for you?
|
Battlefield 6 |
Battlefield 1 |
|
|
In the end, it comes down to personal preference. Battlefield 6 has more content to look forward to and is by far the flashier and more technically “exciting” of the two, but there's definitely a special spark to Battlefield 1 which many players are not ready to walk away from. Battlefield 6 players still emphasize a grounded experience, even when the game may steer a little away from immersion, but ultimately the newest entry in the series maintains the franchise's reputation for being a realistic FPS. But for the most hardcore immersion lovers, Battlefield 1 could be the perfect choice. Regardless, the two military shooters showcase different reasons why Battlefield franchise has achieved such longevity.
- Released
-
10 October 2025
- ESRB
-
Mature 17+ / Blood and Gore, Intense Violence, Strong Language, In-App Purchases, User Interaction
- Developer
-
Battlefield Studios
